esrosedotblog

AGAINST

Paul Krugman hits a homer in his NYT column this morning explaining to the brain dead why Dean or Clark are necessary nominees. Who gets it?

I could take Clark if it came to that, but those hunched squarish shoulders are a bit much. Gnomish. Wound up. The cartoonists would have a field day. He is not a good visual as handsome as his face is.

Why is this important? Well we know what he is against: Bush. I have no idea what he is for. Bush isn't for anything either. So we go for the beauty contest. Straight guys like Bush's guy-ness. Clark will have to beat him on that.